Posts tagged "Barbosa"

Commonwealth v. Barbosa (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-001-18)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

16-P-1030                                       Appeals Court

COMMONWEALTH  vs.  ADERITO BARBOSA.

No. 16-P-1030.

Suffolk.      September 8, 2017. – January 3, 2018.

Present:  Rubin, Neyman, & Henry, JJ.

Practice, Criminal, Motion to suppress.  Constitutional Law, Search and seizure.  Search and Seizure, Search incident to lawful arrest.

Indictments found and returned in the Superior Court Department on June 30, 2015.

A pretrial motion to suppress evidence was heard by Kenneth W. Salinger, J. read more

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - January 3, 2018 at 5:31 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , ,

Commonwealth v. Barbosa (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-144-17)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

SJC-11720

COMMONWEALTH  vs.  JASON BARBOSA.

Suffolk.     February 10, 2017. – August 25, 2017.

Present:  Gants, C.J., Hines, Lowy, & Budd, JJ.[1]

HomicideJoint EnterpriseEvidence, Joint venturer, Expert opinion, Hearsay, Spontaneous utterance, Opinion.  Practice, Criminal, Capital case, Opening statement, Argument by prosecutor, Assistance of counsel, Indictment.

Indictments found and returned in the Superior Court Department on May 23, 2012.

A motion to dismiss was heard by Charles J. Hely, J., and the case was tried before Christine M. McEvoy, J. read more

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - August 25, 2017 at 8:13 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , ,

Barbosa v. Commonwealth (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-137-16)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

SJC-11760

RICARDO BARBOSA  vs.  COMMONWEALTH.

August 26, 2016.

Supreme Judicial Court, Superintendence of inferior courts.  Bail.

Ricardo Barbosa appeals from a judgment of the county court denying his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, by which he sought a reduction in bail.  We affirm.

Barbosa stands indicted on charges of rape and of being a habitual criminal.  A judge in the Superior Court set his bail at $ 25,000, with GPS monitoring and other conditions.[1]  Barbosa’s G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition followed.  A single justice of this court denied relief without a hearing.  “This court’s review of the judgment of the single justice is ‘limited to correcting errors of law and abuse of discretion.’”  Leo v. Commonwealth, 442 Mass. 1025, 1026 (2004), quoting Preston v. Commonwealth, 391 Mass. 1017, 1017 (1984).  There was no error of law or abuse of discretion in this case.  The amount of bail was not excessive merely because Barbosa could not afford to post it or because he will be compelled to remain in pretrial detention.  See Leo, supra.  On the record before us, we see no basis to disturb the judge’s implicit finding that the amount was necessary to secure Barbosa’s presence at trial.  Finally, as to Barbosa’s challenge to the applicable bail statute itself, we have previously held that G. L. c. 276, § 57, does not violate the constitutional guarantee of due process.  Querubin v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 108, 110-120 (2003).  It is clear from the record that Barbosa had ample opportunity to be heard on the subject of bail.  The single justice was well within his discretion to deny extraordinary relief. read more

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - August 26, 2016 at 10:52 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , ,