Posts tagged "Homeowner’s"

Mac’s Homeowners Association, et al. v. Gebo, et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-141-17)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

16-P-451                                        Appeals Court

MAC’S HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION & another[1]  vs.  JAMES GEBO

& others.[2]

 

 

No. 16-P-451.

Essex.     February 2, 2017. – November 9, 2017.

Present:  Green, Meade, & Agnes, JJ.

Practice, Civil, Motion to dismiss, Consumer protection case.  Manufactured Housing Community.  Cooperative Housing.  Consumer Protection Act, Standing, Unfair or deceptive act.

Civil actions commenced in the Northeast Division of the Housing Court Department on June 24 and July 1, 2014. read more

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - November 9, 2017 at 8:53 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , , , ,

Homeowner’s Rehab, Inc., et al. v. Related Corporate V SLP, L.P., et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 12-143-16)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
SUFFOLK, ss.
SUPERIOR COURT
CIV. NO. 14-3807 BLS2
HOMEOWNER’S REHAB, INC., and
MEMORIAL DRIVE HOUSING, INC.
Plaintiffs
vs.
RELATED CORPORATE V SLP, L.P. and
CENTERLINE CORPORATE PARTNERS V L.P.,
Defendants
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, the Motion is ALLOWED and it is ORDERED that plaintiffs are restrained and enjoined from selling or transferring the property located at 808-812 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pending the outcome of the defendants’ appeal of the Judgment in this matter or upon further Order of this Court. The Court issues this Order based on the representation of defense counsel at the hearing that: 1) the time period for Plaintiff Homeowner’s Rehab, Inc. to exercise any rights under the Right of Frist Refusal and Option Agreement dated July 10, 1997 is tolled for the period that this litigation has been and remains pending; and 2) the parties will cooperate and make reasonable attempts to expedite the appeal of this Court’s decision on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
_________________________________
Janet L. Sanders
Justice of the superior Court
Dated: October 18, 2016 read more

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - November 10, 2016 at 5:39 am

Categories: News   Tags: , , , , , , , ,