Posts tagged "kelly"

Commonwealth of Massachusetts ex rel. Kelly, et al. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 12-098-17)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT

CIVIL ACTION

  1. 2016-03107-BLS1

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,

EX REL., ALLISON KELLY AND FRANK GARCIA

vs.

NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION & Others1

1 Novartis Corporation and Genentech, Inc.

2 The District Court’s order actually dismissed the state claims with prejudice, notwithstanding its declination of jurisdiction over them. The First Circuit reversed that part of the District Court’s decision.  It observed that while the District Court could have dismissed the state claims based on the same reasoning applied to the federal claims had it retainedjurisdiction, once it declined jurisdiction, it was required to dismiss the state claims

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

RELATORS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Allison Kelly and Frank Garcia (Relators) brought qui tam actions against Genentech, Inc. (Genentech) and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Novartis) in federal district court in Massachuesetts under the Federal False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., the Massachusetts False Claims Act (MFCA), G. L. c. 12, § 5B(a)(1)-(10), and several other analogous state statutes.  The federal claims asserted in their complaints were dismissed by the District Court for failure to plead the alleged fraud with the specificity required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).  See U.S. ex rel. Garcia v. Novartis  Pharm. Corp.,91 F. Supp. 3d 87 (D. Mass. 2015).  The dismissal was affirmed by the First Circuit Court of Appeals.  See U.S. ex. rel. Kelly v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.,827 F. 3d 5 (1stCir. 2016) (Kelly).  While the Relators’ FCA claims were dismissed with prejudice, their state claims were dismissed without prejudice because the District Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over them.2 The Relators then filed

read more

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - August 4, 2017 at 9:01 am

Categories: News   Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Commonwealth v. Kelly (and 11 companion cases) (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-026-15)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

SJC-11616

COMMONWEALTH  vs.  AMANDA KELLY

(and eleven companion cases[1]).

Plymouth.     October 7, 2014. – February 20, 2015.

Present:  Gants, C.J., Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Lenk, & Hines, JJ.

 

Assault or Battery for the Purpose of Intimidation.  Civil Rights.  Practice, Criminal, Instructions to jury, Duplicative convictions, Lesser included offense.

Indictments found and returned in the Superior Court Department on August 14, 2008.

The cases were tried before Paul E. Troy, J.

read more

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - February 20, 2015 at 5:44 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , , , ,

Mass. mayors meet to discuss gun laws – WWLP 22News

...

Read more...

Posted by Stephen Sandberg - February 1, 2013 at 9:22 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,