Skip to content

Massachusetts Legal Resources

Massachusetts Legal Resources & News

Menu
  • Massachusetts Legal News
  • Sample Page
Menu

McCabe v. Commissioner of Correction (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-070-13)

Posted on April 29, 2013

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA 02108-1750;  (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

 

SJC‑11365

 

JOHN McCABE  vs.  COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

 

 

April 29, 2013.

 

Supreme Judicial Court, Superintendence of inferior courts, Appeal from order of single justice.  Practice, Civil, Transfer of action to Superior Court.

 

 

 

In 1986, John McCabe was committed to the Massachusetts Treatment Center (treatment center) as a sexually dangerous person. Several years later, a Superior Court judge ordered that he be remanded to the custody of the Commissioner of Correction, subject to the terms of McCabe’s unexpired criminal sentences.  More than twenty years later, McCabe filed an application in the county court seeking a declaration, pursuant to G. L. c. 231A, § 5, that he must be returned to the treatment center.  The single justice ordered the matter transferred to the Superior Court, pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 4A, and ordered that it be consolidated with another case that McCabe had commenced there that raised essentially the same issue.  McCabe appeals from the order transferring his case to the Superior Court.  We affirm.

 

The decision to transfer a matter pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 4A, between this court and another is a matter commended to the single justice’s discretion.  See Stow v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1002, 1002 (1996); Callahan v. Board of Bar Overseers, 417 Mass. 516, 519-520 (1994).  McCabe fails to demonstrate any error or abuse of that discretion, and there is no occasion to disturb the single justice’s order transferring the case.  McCabe’s rights are fully protected by his ability to litigate his claim in the Superior Court.  We express no opinion on the merits of the claim.

 

Judgment affirmed.

 

 

The case was submitted on briefs.

John McCabe, pro se.

Michael H. Cohen for Commissioner of Correction.

Full-text Opinions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • COMMONWEALTH vs. MICHAEL NOGUERA
  • COMMONWEALTH vs. MICHAEL NOGUERA – Summary
  • COMMONWEALTH vs. BYRON PALMER.
  • Commonwealth v. Palmer (AC 24-P-365) COMMONWEALTH vs. BYRON PALMER – SUMMARY
  • Hello world!

Recent Comments

  1. 📮 ⏳ Notice: 1.5 BTC expiring. Open account >> https://graph.org/Get-your-BTC-09-04?hs=7c75c9c8ac7ecf8fdfeefdf7c2d4f794& 📮 on Hello world!
  2. Jessepigue on Removed Tremont St. Trees Presented Public Safety Hazard, According to City
  3. Aaronspalp on Removed Tremont St. Trees Presented Public Safety Hazard, According to City
  4. DanielTew on Removed Tremont St. Trees Presented Public Safety Hazard, According to City
  5. Jessepigue on Removed Tremont St. Trees Presented Public Safety Hazard, According to City
©2025 Massachusetts Legal Resources | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme

Powered by
...
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by