Skip to content

Massachusetts Legal Resources

Massachusetts Legal Resources & News

Menu
  • Massachusetts Legal News
  • Sample Page
Menu

Commonwealth v. McGrath (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-085-17)

Posted on May 26, 2017

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

 

SJC-11909

 

COMMONWEALTH  vs.  George McGrath.

 

 

May 25, 2017.

 

 

Supreme Judicial Court, Superintendence of inferior courts. Practice, Criminal, Capital case.

 

 

George McGrath purports to appeal from the decision of a single justice of this court, pursuant to the gatekeeper provision of G. L. c. 278, § 33E, denying leave to appeal from the denial of his motion for a new trial on charges of murder in the first degree and assault with intent to rob.[1]  “A defendant who is denied leave to appeal from a single justice acting as a gatekeeper . . . has no right to appeal from the single justice’s ruling denying leave.  The single justice’s ruling is ‘final and unreviewable.’”  Commonwealth v. Companiono, 472 Mass. 1004, 1005 (2015), quoting Commonwealth v. Gunter, 456 Mass. 1017, 1017 (2010), S.C., 459 Mass. 480, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 868 (2011).  We see no reason to depart from this longstanding rule.  See Commonwealth v. Robinson, 477 Mass.     (2017).

 

Appeal dismissed.

 

The case was submitted on briefs.

Kathleen M. McCarthy for the defendant.

Teresa K. Anderson, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

     [1] McGrath’s convictions were affirmed on direct appeal after plenary review.  Commonwealth v. McGrath, 358 Mass. 314 (1970).  In addition, we reversed the allowance of McGrath’s previous motion for a new trial.  Commonwealth v. McGrath, 437 Mass. 46, cert. denied, 537 U.S. 980 (2002).

Full-text Opinions

Recent Posts

  • COMMONWEALTH vs. MICHAEL NOGUERA
  • COMMONWEALTH vs. MICHAEL NOGUERA – Summary
  • COMMONWEALTH vs. BYRON PALMER.
  • Commonwealth v. Palmer (AC 24-P-365) COMMONWEALTH vs. BYRON PALMER – SUMMARY
  • Hello world!

Recent Comments

  1. 🖨 ✉️ New Alert: 1.95 BTC from exchange. Review transfer >> https://graph.org/Get-your-BTC-09-04?hs=c131f7a790b1125441ae8fb32e8e5a1b& 🖨 on Massachusetts Legal News
  2. 🔒 ✉️ Incoming Notification - 1.65 BTC from exchange. Claim funds >> https://graph.org/Get-your-BTC-09-04?hs=7c75c9c8ac7ecf8fdfeefdf7c2d4f794& 🔒 on Hello world!
  3. รับผลิตของพรีเมี่ยม on Commonwealth v. Zammuto (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-018-16)
  4. รับผลิตของพรีเมี่ยม on Memorial Day Weekend Traffic in Real Time
  5. รับผลิตของพรีเมี่ยม on South End Senate Election Results 2013
©2025 Massachusetts Legal Resources | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme

Powered by
...
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by