The Gillette Company v. Provost, et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-023-17)
Anti-SLAPP protections and litigation privilege do not bar counterclaims alleging a company filed a baseless lawsuit to prevent competition.
Anti-SLAPP protections and litigation privilege do not bar counterclaims alleging a company filed a baseless lawsuit to prevent competition.
Landlord's harassment prevention orders against tenants vacated. Conduct did not meet statute's three-act threshold.
Law firm cannot revoke professional courtesy credits previously written off to client after representation ends, as credits constituted express waiver under contract law and fiduciary duty principles.
Expungement of harassment prevention orders available only upon clear showing of fraud on court, not mere conflicting testimony about email content.
Attorney-client privilege waived when client sues for legal malpractice; information used to defend malpractice action was substantively relevant to underlying case.
Bail forfeiture reversed where defendants satisfied bail conditions with no default. Judge lacked authority to forfeit and apply bail to restitution without proper evidentiary hearing.
Court affirmed property division in divorce but vacated temporary child support orders lacking required findings of deviation from guidelines.
Tort claim against MBTA dismissed for failure to present claim to executive officer within statutory period, despite agency's investigation and settlement offers to other plaintiffs.
Zoning board properly interpreted local bylaw to afford grandfather protection to nonconforming lot held in common ownership despite merger doctrine.
Contribution claims barred when settlement with Commonwealth did not release joint tortfeasors. Other tort claims survive dismissal despite statute of limitations concerns.