Needham v. Director of the Office of Medicaid (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-166-15)
Probate court cannot compel MassHealth to recognize trust reformation in Medicaid eligibility determination when reformation occurred within look-back period.
Probate court cannot compel MassHealth to recognize trust reformation in Medicaid eligibility determination when reformation occurred within look-back period.
Insufficient evidence of cocaine constructive possession may support threshold eligibility for erroneous conviction relief when evidence gap tends to establish actual innocence.
Contractor violated dig safe law by providing inaccurate excavation notice and failing to use reasonable precautions, causing gas line strike and explosion. Four separate violations affirmed.
Juvenile Court properly issued harassment prevention order against eleven-year-old boy for sexually explicit comments, threats, and intimidation of female classmate across series of incidents.
Marlborough city council's denial of fuel storage license reviewed under arbitrary and capricious standard. Council's discretionary decision had rational basis in members' concerns about traffic, safety, and neighborhood effects.
Church property dispute resolved using neutral principles of property law without interpreting canon law or religious doctrine.
Inmate's termination from garden program after disciplinary conviction held not a second sanction but permissible security-based removal under prison officials' discretion.
Reversed. Larceny by false pretenses conviction reversed due to improperly admitted hearsay. Misleading-police conviction reversed because sham investigation into fake crime was not a criminal investigation under statute.
Latent fingerprint on window pane used to enter burglarized market, combined with circumstantial crime scene evidence, sufficiently supports conviction for breaking and entering and larceny.
Registered sex offender convicted of false registration information as second offender. Trial judge erred in limiting peremptory challenges but reversal requires showing prejudice; defendant failed to demonstrate unfair jury.