Posts tagged "Forlizzi"

Commonwealth v. Forlizzi (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-003-16)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us   SJC-11747   COMMONWEALTH  vs.  david forlizzi. January 5, 2016.     Supreme Judicial Court, Superintendence of inferior courts.  Practice, Criminal, Disclosure of identity of informer, Appeal by Commonwealth.  Witness, Police informer.     The Commonwealth appeals from the judgment of a single justice of this court denying its petition for relief, pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court.  We affirm.   In the underlying Superior Court case, the respondent, David Forlizzi, sought and obtained an order requiring the Commonwealth to disclose whether a witness cooperating against him previously has served as a confidential informant or cooperating witness.  The Superior Court judge concluded that prior cooperation by the witness could be relevant to demonstrating the witness’s bias or hope of benefit or reward.  The single justice considered the judge’s order and held that “[n]o abuse of discretion is evident in the judge’s decision that disclosure is necessary and material to the defense in this case.  The informant is a percipient witness whose testimony will form a key part of the Commonwealth’s case at trial.”  Concluding that the Commonwealth failed to demonstrate that relief was warranted, the single justice denied the petition.   This court “rarely allow[s] Commonwealth appeals of interlocutory matters under [its] supervisory powers. . . .  We will review interlocutory matters in criminal cases only when ‘substantial claims’ of ‘irremediable’ error are presented . . . and only in ‘exceptional circumstances’ . . . where ‘it becomes necessary to protect substantive rights” (citations omitted).  Commonwealth v. Cook, 380 Mass. 314, 319-320 (1980).  See Commonwealth v. Richardson, 454 Mass. 1005, 1005-1006 (2009).  Although exceptional circumstances sometimes have been demonstrated in cases involving the disclosure of information relating to confidential informants and witnesses, see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Jordan, 464 Mass. 1004 (2012) (disclosure of informant’s identity not material to defense), this is not such a case.  We employ our power of superintendence sparingly and “[n]o party, including the Commonwealth, should expect that the court will exercise its extraordinary power of general superintendence lightly.”  Commonwealth v. Narea, 454 Mass. 1003, 1004 n.1 (2009).  In this case, the single justice properly could have denied review because the Commonwealth failed to demonstrate the presence of exceptional circumstances.  See Commonwealth v. Charles, 466 Mass. 63, 88-89 (2013) (systemic issues affecting proper administration of judiciary warranted review under […]

Read more...

Posted by Massachusetts Legal Resources - January 5, 2016 at 6:11 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , ,

Forlizzi, et al. v. Commonwealth (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-070-15)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us   SJC-11746   DAVID FORLIZZI & another[1]  vs.  COMMONWEALTH.     April 28, 2015.     Supreme Judicial Court, Superintendence of inferior courts.  Practice, Criminal, Interlocutory appeal.     David Forlizzi and Fred Battista appeal from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying their petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3.  The petition sought relief from the orders of a Superior Court judge denying their motions to dismiss indictments and from the judge’s decision not to conduct an evidentiary hearing on their motions.  The single justice denied the petition.  We affirm.   Background.  Forlizzi has been indicted on charges of obstruction of justice, in violation of G. L. c. 268, § 13B; three counts of corruption of a witness, in violation of G. L. c. 268A, § 2 (c); three counts of subornation of perjury, in violation of G. L. c. 268, § 2; and multiple counts of conspiracy to violate those same laws, G. L. c. 274, § 7.  He also has been indicted as a habitual offender, in violation of G. L. c. 279, § 25.  Battista faces similar charges.  These indictments arise out of the petitioners’ alleged misconduct in connection with a prior trial involving alleged insurance fraud.       In the Superior Court, Forlizzi (joined by Battista) moved to dismiss the indictments, alleging that, during the investigation leading to the indictments, the Commonwealth had engaged in prosecutorial misconduct.  They claimed that the Commonwealth caused the grand jury to subpoena the bank records of trial counsel in violation of Mass. R. Prof. C. 3.8 (f), 426 Mass. 1397 (1998), and that the Attorney General improperly obtained counsels’ tax records though the insurance fraud bureau.  A Superior Court judge denied the motion, concluding that the proscription of rule 3.8 (f) does not apply to third-party record holders such as banking institutions, but that the mechanism used by the prosecutors to obtain the attorneys’ tax records constituted overreaching.  The judge determined, however, that dismissal of the indictments as a sanction was not warranted in the circumstances.  Forlizzi thereafter filed a second motion to dismiss, which also was denied.  The judge reasoned that Forlizzi “has not demonstrated that the Commonwealth engaged in conduct designed to interfere with [his] . . . right [under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution] to counsel of choice, nor has he persuaded the [c]ourt that an evidentiary hearing would likely produce evidence to establish his claim.”     […]

Read more...

Posted by Massachusetts Legal Resources - April 28, 2015 at 4:09 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , ,

slot demo

slot demo

slot demo

slot demo

slot77

slot88

janji gacor

slot gacor

slot resmi

https://vivagames-yourtoy.com/

https://twincountynews.com/

https://urbanpopupfood.com/

https://creativestockphoto.com/

https://thevampirediariessoundtrack.com/

https://comediankeithrobinson.com/

https://hoteldasfigueiras.com/

slot demo

slot777

slot demo

slot777

slot777

slot thailand

slot thailand

slot thailand

slot777

slot 4d

slot thailand

slot777

slot demo

slot777

slot thailand

slot777

slot demo

slot thailand

slot777

slot demo

slot thailand

slot demo

slot terpercaya

slot thailand

slot maxwin

slot 4d

slot thailand

slot qris

akun pro thailand

slot maxwin

bandarxl

naga666

agen5000

agen5000

live draw hk

toto macau

slot thailand

slot777

slot demo

slot mahjong

slot777

slot thailand

slot777.

slot thailand

slot thailand

slot thailand

slot777

https://jurnal.fti.umi.ac.id/products/slotthailand/

slot demo

slot demo

slot thailand

slot777

slot777

slot demo

slot dana

slot77

agen5000

agen5000

harum4d

harum4d

dadu4d

vilaslot

harum4d

slot777

harumslot

vilaslot

harum4d

harumslot

harumslot

harum4d

slot thailand

slot thailand

slot777

slot thailand

slot dana

slot thailand

slot777

slot terpercaya

slot terpercaya hari ini

slot demo

slot777

live draw hk

slot777

slot dana

slot demo

slot gacor

slot demo

slot777

slot777

slot 4d

slot thailand

slot777

slot demo

slot777

slot thailand

slot777

slot demo

slot thailand

slot777

slot demo

slot thailand

slot demo

slot terpercaya

slot thailand

slot maxwin

slot 4d

slot thailand

slot qris

akun pro thailand

slot maxwin

bandarxl

naga666

agen5000

agen5000

live draw hk

toto macau

slot thailand

slot777

slot777

slot demo

slot mahjong

slot777

slot thailand

slot777

slot thailand

slot thailand

slot thailand

slot777

https://jurnal.fti.umi.ac.id/products/slotthailand/

slot demo

slot demo

slot thailand

https://slot777.smknukotacirebon.sch.id/

slot777

slot demo

slot dana

slot thailand

agen5000

agen5000

harum4d

harum4d

dadu4d

vilaslot

harum4d

slot777

harumslot

vilaslot

harum4d

harumslot

harumslot

harum4d


Warning: include(/home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/includes/db.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/cnt.php on line 1

Warning: include(/home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/includes/db.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/cnt.php on line 1

Warning: include(): Failed opening '/home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/includes/db.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/opt/cpanel/ea-php72/root/usr/share/pear') in /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/cnt.php on line 1

Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/cnt.php on line 1

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function _a9cde373() on null in /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/cnt.php:1 Stack trace: #0 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/cnt.php(1): _b9566752() #1 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/wp-content/themes/hmtpro5/footer.php(237): include_once('/home/chelseam/...') #2 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/wp-includes/template.php(790): require_once('/home/chelseam/...') #3 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/wp-includes/template.php(725): load_template('/home/chelseam/...', true, Array) #4 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/wp-includes/general-template.php(92): locate_template(Array, true, true, Array) #5 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/wp-content/themes/hmtpro5/archive.php(141): get_footer() #6 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/wp-includes/template-loader.php(106): include('/home/chelseam/...') #7 /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com in /home/chelseam/public_html/masslegalresources.com/stas/cnt.php on line 1