Commonwealth v. Grady (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-097-16)
Defendant's failure to move to strike substitute analyst's improper weight testimony, though he opposed the analyst's testimony via motion in limine, did not preserve appellate rights. Affirmed.
Defendant's failure to move to strike substitute analyst's improper weight testimony, though he opposed the analyst's testimony via motion in limine, did not preserve appellate rights. Affirmed.
Zoning variance became effective despite late recording when variance holder substantially relied on it within statutory period and recorded within days of deadline.