Posts tagged "1013815"

Commonwealth v. McGhee (and seven companion cases) (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-138-15)

NOTICE:  All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports.  If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557-1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us   SJC-11821   COMMONWEALTH  vs.  TYSHAUN McGHEE (and seven companion cases[1]).       Suffolk.     April 6, 2015. – August 13, 2015.   Present:  Gants, C.J., Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Lenk, & Hines, JJ.     Exploitation of People.  Trafficking.  Deriving Support from Prostitution.  Statute, Validity, Construction.  Due Process of Law, Vagueness of statute.  Constitutional Law, Vagueness of statute, Freedom of association.  Grand Jury.  Witness, Cross-examination, Impeachment, Bias.  Evidence, Cross-examination, Testimony before grand jury, Impeachment of credibility, Bias, Prior misconduct, Sexual conduct.  Rape-Shield Statute.  Practice, Criminal, Grand jury proceedings, Transcript of testimony before grand jury, Assistance of counsel, Confrontation of witnesses, Sentence.  Words, “Commercial sexual activity.”       Indictments found and returned in the Superior Court Department on December 19, 2012.   The cases were tried before Diane M. Kottmyer, J.   The Supreme Judicial Court granted an application for direct appellate review.     Sharon Dehmand for Tyshaun McGhee. David M. Jellinek for Sidney McGee. Matthew T. Sears, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth. The following submitted briefs for amici curiae: Amy Farrell, pro se. Maura Healey, Attorney General, & Susanne G. Reardon, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General.      Julie Dahlstrom, Felicia H. Ellsworth, Tasha Bahal, & Michelle L. Sandals for Ascentria Care Alliance & others.     SPINA, J.  In this case, we are asked to consider, for the first time, the constitutionality of the Massachusetts sex trafficking statute.  On November 21, 2011, the Legislature approved “An Act relative to the commercial exploitation of people,” which criminalized sexual servitude, forced labor, and organ trafficking as of its effective date of February 19, 2012.  St. 2011, c. 178, §§ 1-31.  The portions of the enactment at issue here, pertaining to the trafficking of persons for sexual servitude, were codified at G. L. c. 265, §§ 49, 50.  See St. 2011, c. 178, § 23. General Laws c. 265, § 50 (a), states, in relevant part: “Whoever knowingly:  (i) subjects, or attempts to subject, or recruits, entices, harbors, transports, provides or obtains by any means . . . another person to engage in commercial sexual activity . . . or causes a person to engage in commercial sexual activity . . . or (ii) benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, as a result of a violation of clause (i), shall be guilty of the crime of trafficking of persons for sexual servitude and shall be […]

Read more...

Posted by Massachusetts Legal Resources - August 13, 2015 at 5:00 pm

Categories: News   Tags: , , , , , , ,