Commonwealth v. Harris (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-026-13)
Murder conviction affirmed. Self-defense instruction proper despite general language on provocation. 911 recording and prosecutor's use thereof admissible.
Murder conviction affirmed. Self-defense instruction proper despite general language on provocation. 911 recording and prosecutor's use thereof admissible.
Probationer denied disclosure of confidential informant's identity before revocation hearing. Court held disclosure may be required where informant is sole nongovernmental witness and active participant in alleged offense.
Minority shareholders and directors of a family-held bakery sought privileged communications regarding litigation. The court held that because the shareholders pursued buyout claims adverse to the corporation's interests, they could not access litigation documents protected by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine.
Reversal of housing authority's termination of rental voucher for failure to report household composition change where authority failed to provide required settlement conference and applicable regulations impermissibly vague.
Parole officer investigation into potential parole violations qualifies as criminal proceeding under witness tampering statute protecting parole officers and those with information about violations.
Judges must consider federal tax consequences of alimony provisions when parties present evidence, even where tax treatment remains uncertain under federal law.
Affirmed on title claim; vacated and remanded on prescriptive easement claim. Eroded beach parcel held subject to fixed landward boundary despite seaward migration.
Assault conviction reversed where medical records documenting liver laceration lacked expert testimony explaining the injury's severity and functional impact.
School superintendent's employment contract providing for postretirement health insurance reimbursement does not violate six-year limit on superintendent contracts under G.L. c. 71, § 41.
Prosecution may introduce prior violent acts evidence of self-defense claimant to rebut victim's violent history evidence, but only with advance notice and careful judicial gatekeeping.