Commonwealth v. Vital (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-068-13)
Priest-penitent privilege does not protect communications when defendant sought pastor's help contacting victim's family to settle abuse case, violating restraining order.
Priest-penitent privilege does not protect communications when defendant sought pastor's help contacting victim's family to settle abuse case, violating restraining order.
Appeal from summary judgment dismissing contract and tort claims based on one-year contractual limitations period. Court vacates, finding contractual provision unenforceable because it precludes discovery rule.
Insolvency fund subject to consumer protection liability and must pay attorney's fees when plaintiff prevails in consumer action.
Murder convictions affirmed despite claims of Miranda violations, improper interrogation after invocation of right to silence, Brady violation regarding witness identification, and Fourth Amendment issues with evidence seizure.
Investors in Madoff feeder funds sued KPMG for fraud and misrepresentation. Court held investors' claims were direct, not derivative, and therefore not subject to arbitration provisions in unsigned engagement letters.
Insurer properly applied pro rata allocation method to asbestos indemnity payments under occurrence-based liability policies despite insured's argument for joint and several coverage.
Circumstantial evidence sufficiently proved the defendant intended to intimidate a witness to a criminal proceeding when he threatened the victim in a courthouse hallway.
Defendants convicted of first-degree murder for shooting on MBTA train that killed unborn child. Joint venture liability affirmed where evidence supported either defendant as shooter with knowing assistance from other.
Murder conviction affirmed where defendant's DNA matched victim's, witnesses placed him at scene, and he possessed victim's stolen car.
Couriers in New York sued Massachusetts company for misclassification and wage violations. Contract's choice-of-law clause for Massachusetts law is valid and enforceable despite workers' out-of-state location.